Back to AI Automation
    AI Automation
    Professional Services
    A build like this typically runs for five months from discovery through firm integration.

    REPRESENTATIVE BUILD

    Give Legal Teams Structured Review With Source Citations

    Representative regional law firm scenario with 12 attorneys, six paralegals, more than 200 annual contracts, and regular due diligence work.

    The Challenge

    Attorneys read each contract clause and compare it with firm standards, client terms, and matter context.

    Due diligence sets contain many document types, risks, obligations, and deadlines that need consistent review.

    Email attachments, matter folders, and past work use inconsistent names and access rules.

    Our Approach

    A fixed-scope discovery maps document types, firm clauses, risk rules, matter permissions, and attorney approval points.

    The intake system classifies email attachments and proposes the correct matter folder.

    Review tools flag unusual terms and produce cited summaries for attorney review, not legal decisions.

    A private search index lets authorized users find relevant past work with source citations.

    An evaluation suite tests clause coverage, citations, permissions, and false negatives before go-live.

    The client owns the code, prompts, tests, and runbooks. The build has no seat-based price.

    Legal Document Workflow

    1

    Document Intake

    The system captures documents from email and client portals.

    2

    Classification

    Rules propose a document type and matter folder.

    3

    Contract Analysis

    Models compare contract terms with approved firm rules.

    4

    Issue Flag

    The system cites unusual terms and missing provisions for attorney review.

    5

    Cited Summary

    Structured summaries link obligations and deadlines to source text.

    6

    Knowledge Search

    Authorized users search past work for similar issues and precedents.

    What This System Changes

    Attorneys review cited issues and structured summaries instead of an unsupported model answer.
    Matter permissions apply to intake, search, and review results.
    Every AI-assisted output remains subject to attorney review.
    Evaluation results define the go-live threshold and fallback path.

    Facing a Similar Challenge?

    We would like to understand your situation and explore how we can help. No sales pressure, just a conversation about what is possible.