Regional law firm with 12 attorneys and 6 paralegals focusing on business law, real estate transactions, and mergers and acquisitions. Handles 200+ contracts annually and regular due diligence projects.
Contract review required attorneys to manually read every clause in vendor agreements, leases, and purchase contracts. Standard contract review took 2 to 3 hours per document even for routine agreements.
Due diligence projects involved reviewing hundreds of documents to identify risks, obligations, and key terms. Junior attorneys and paralegals spent weeks on document review for each transaction.
Incoming documents from clients and opposing counsel arrived via email with inconsistent naming and no automatic organization. Staff manually filed documents into matter folders, and locating specific documents during time-sensitive negotiations required extensive searching.
Knowledge from past matters was locked in individual attorney experience and closed case files. Associates frequently asked partners whether the firm had handled similar issues before, but institutional knowledge was not searchable.
We implemented a document classification system that automatically sorts incoming emails and attachments into the correct matter folders based on sender, subject line, and document content. The system handles contracts, correspondence, pleadings, and discovery materials.
A compliance document review agent was trained on the firm's standard contract provisions and risk factors. The agent reviews contracts and highlights non-standard clauses, missing provisions, unfavorable terms, and potential risks. Attorneys review flagged sections rather than reading every word.
For due diligence projects, the agent processes document sets and generates summaries organized by category: financial obligations, termination rights, change of control provisions, indemnification, and intellectual property. Each summary includes citations to source documents.
We built an internal knowledge search system that indexes all past matters, briefs, research memos, and contracts. Attorneys can search using natural language questions to find relevant past work, precedents, and research.
All systems integrate with the firm's document management system and email platform. Audit trails track all AI-assisted work for client billing and professional responsibility compliance.
Incoming documents from email and client portals are captured automatically
Documents are categorized by type and routed to appropriate matter folders
Contracts are scanned for standard clauses, risks, and unusual terms
Non-standard provisions and risks are highlighted for attorney review
Key terms, obligations, and deadlines are extracted into structured summaries
Past work product is searchable for similar issues and precedents
Claims adjusters spent 4 to 6 hours daily manually reviewing medical records attached to claims. Documents arrived in inconsistent formats including PDFs, faxes, and scanned images.
Read Case StudyConsultants spent hours searching shared drives and legacy project folders to find relevant past work. File naming conventions were inconsistent, and folder structures varied by practice area.
Read Case StudyMaintenance requests arrived via phone, email, text, and tenant portal with no centralized tracking. Staff manually logged requests into spreadsheets, leading to lost tickets and duplicate work.
Read Case StudyCustomer service staff spent 60% of their time answering order status inquiries that could be resolved by checking the shipping system. Ticket volume tripled during holiday peaks, creating multi-day response backlogs.
Read Case Study